Gilad Atzmon writes:

For quite some time the British have accepted that British-Jewish organisations have hijacked the political discourse. As has happened in other Western countries, the British political establishment has engaged is a relentless rant against anti-Semitsm. Sometime the focus drifts for a day or two. An alleged “Russian nerve agent attack” provided a 48-hour pause. Occasionally we bomb Arabs in the name of “humanitarian intervention” only to realise a day or two later that we have, once again, followed a premeditated foreign agenda. But, somehow, we always return to the anti-Semitsm debate, as if our media and politicians are a herd of flies gravitating to a pile of poop.

Last week the Board of Deputies of British Jews (BDBJ) and Jewish Leadership Council (JLC), two Jewish organisations that claim to “represent” British Jews, published this painful-to-watch video.

Judging by the number of viewers, the British people are tired of these nauseating outbursts. Britons know very well that when it comes to hate crimes, Jews are not high on the victim list: Jews are far less “victimised” than Blacks, Muslims, Roma, transsexuals, gays and many others.

Since Jewish community “leaders” remain obsessed with anti Semitism, I will try to help these “leaders” understand the universal perspective on the meaning of anti-Semitsm.

The real anti-Semitism

True anti-Semitsm is when Israeli army snipers film themselves shooting unarmed Semite protesters like sitting ducks while laughing their heads off!

True anti-Semitsm is when the Jewish State legislates and enforces institutional racism against actual Semites, Blacks and goyim (gentiles) in general.

The Gaza siege is an example of what common people see as real anti-Semitsm. It is designed to humiliate and deprive Semites for being Semites and it has turned Gaza into the largest open air prison known to man.

Enough is Enough is humanity expressing collective fatigue of these barbarian actions.

I would prefer to believe that the Jewish fear of anti-Semitsm is actually an expression of collective Jewish guilt. For obvious reasons, Jews find it hard to compartmentalise Jewish identity within the context of the Jewish State being a rogue state.

There are a few modes of dealing with collective guilt that have been recognized. Repression seems to be the most common one. Some argue, in that regard, that escapism and denial are Israel’s primary belief systems.

Acknowledgment of guilt is, undoubtedly, far more painful. The Germans made it into their way of living after the last big war. Maybe Jews can actually learn from the Germans – instead of attempting to emulate the Third Reich’s racist agenda, Israel and its supporters should try to reproduce the Germans’ post postwar remorse. As it happens, there are very few Jews and Israelis who acknowledge their responsibility for the Palestinians’ plight and support the Palestinian right of return. These rare Jews are brave enough to admit that Israel is inherently anti-Semitic and racist to the core.

However, silencing Israel’s dissent is the usual Jewish political method to resolve Jewish guilt. Attributing the “anti-Semitic” slur to others is how both the Zionists and the so called “anti” kicking the ball to the goyim’s yard. This method was effective for a while but it doesn’t work anymore: being called an anti-Semite in 2018 is a synonym for an ethically driven humanist, an anti racist, a truth teller, peace and justice role model, a rock star. The list of “anti-Semites” is growing exponentially, probably in direct proportion with the tidal rise in Jewish guilt. The more guilty (some) Jews feel, the more the rest of us are becoming anti-Semitic in their eyes.

“Unconscious is the discourse of the Other,” was, probably Jacques Lacan’s most astute psychoanalytical observation. It is the fear that the Other, in this case, the gentile, the humanist, sees you truly. It is the fear that the goy can detect your shame. Jewish guilt as such is the unbearable fear that the goyim know.