Fernando Guevara writes:

A Corbett Report from 2020, titled The Real Bill Gates wants Population Culling, is a disturbing exposé that includes extensive coverage with Bill Gates as the speaker. It is about population control. The broadcast includes an excerpt of a 60 Minutes show covering a presentation where Bill Gates is heard to express concern about the increasing world population and whether providing new medicines and keeping children alive would “create more of a population problem”. Footage is shown of two white (or pink, rather) persons walking, talking, in front of a group of dark-skinned people (who are not heard talking):  

Pink person 1: 

– And what the developing world does not need is more children. 

Pink person 2 (looks like Melinda): 
– Hmmm. And I think that was the biggest “aha” to Bill and me when we got into this work is we
asked ourselves of course the same hard-nosed question you’d ask, which is if you get into this
work and you start to save these children, will women just keep overpopulating the world? And
thank goodness, the converse is absolutely true. 
(See video, starting at 5 minutes, 48 seconds. 

Who are ”these children”? Apparently, they are not “our children”.

Apparently, “we” do not have the same need to develop as the “developing world”. Or at least, “we” do not have the inclination.

There was much talk of the problems “they” face in the “Third World,” and how to obtain the tools to limit them. After having stated that the world population is headed to about 9 billion, Bill Gates says: “Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 per cent” (see video, at 6 minutes, 50 seconds). 

What vaccines? What are “reproductive health services”? The mind shivers. Is the US Department of Health and Human Services” involved? Is the US National Institute of Health (NIH) involved? Dr Anthony Fauci and NIAID? The UN Population Fund for special projects? The UN Development Programme (UNDP)? UNICEF? The University of Pittsburgh? 

The report reveals that Pfizer is developing a contraceptive device that can be carried in a “health care” workers’ kit to be given to the women “at the village level”. Already in 2014, Microchips Biotech Inc. announced a remote-controlled wireless implant contraceptive that could be turned on an off remotely. The Gates Foundation invested $20 million in the development of the implants. By Bill Gates own admission, reducing population growth has been a core mission of the Gates Foundation since its inception. I assume that no pun was intended. The narrator states that, to understand what Gates means by “population control”, we need to look beyond the concept of birth control: what Gates means is controlling the population itself. 

The Vaccine Alliance, GAVI, partners the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (the largest private foundation in the world) with the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Bank and vaccine manufacturers to help insure “healthy markets” for vaccines. For vaccines. Not for people. For vaccines. In 2017, GAVI started focusing on providing every child on the planet with a digital biometric identity. “Immunisation needs a technology boost,” said GAVI Chief Executive Officer Seth Berkley. He said the goal of 100 per cent immunisation cannot be implemented without “secure digital identification systems that can store a child’s medical history” (see video, at 14 minutes, 05 seconds). From there, he goes on to describe the project “Khusi Baby”.

Seth Berkley states that if people later want to own land, or have their rights, you’re able to help “them” with that (see video, at 16 minutes, 20 seconds).

Bill Gates has spent years funding research that can bring vaccine and identity together. The technologies involved are explained in the broadcast. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is involved. GAVI has co-founded the ID 2020 Alliance. Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation are involved. In 2018 GAVI expressed the need for “finding, identifying and registering the most vulnerable children” (see video, at 15 minutes, 20 seconds). Eventually, there will be digital certificates to show who has recovered from Corona or who has been tested recently. Private company Onfido is working with the UK government to provide digital certifications, referred to as “immunity passports”.

The University of Pittsburgh is involved. Nandan Nilekani, (entrepreneur, co-founder of Indian multinational Infosys and Gates’s friend) is involved, as is the Indian government. Nilekani’s Infosys is “driven by values”. Perhaps someone should tell him that greed is not a value. India has enrolled over 1 billion people in the largest biometric identification data base ever constructed (the AADHAAR identification grid system). The entirety of the Indian population is targeted. Nilekani is identified as chief architect of the programme. The fact that the identity cards have 12 digits provides additional information about the intended reach/ambitions of the project. The company IDEMIA is involved. IDEMIA is developing digital drivers’ licences for use in the US. The ID4D Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) was established with catalytic contributions from the Bill and Malinda Gates Foundation in 2016 followed by partnership with the UK government, the French government, the Australian government and the Omidyar Network (see video, at 24 minutes, 45 seconds). Increasingly, the technologies involved can be read by smart phones. Bill Gates talks about bringing the AADHAAR grid to every mobile phone user in India. So, I assume telecommunications companies are involved. Ericsson has been “India’s connectivity partner for 116 years,” according to Ericsson itself. Is Serco Group involved? Is G4S? The Rockefeller Foundation keeps popping up. Gates is funding the World Bank as well as other business ventures involved. 

Bill Gates’s statements as well as those of others involved constitute a study of contradictions and assumptions, as well as a damning exposé of racism that makes a mockery of the human race. After some nauseatingly racist coverage, however, it becomes clear that everybody is included. Global rollout is planned: every person on earth is targeted for “identification”. Pakistan and “Africa” are in line. 

The identification project shows a final divorce from human values. It is sold to the public as “financial inclusion” and human rights. Governments, international organisations and private companies are brought together in a digital payment grid (the Better Than Cash Alliance) tied to biometric identity. Bill Gates talks about a pending rollout of payment banks, digital infrastructure and “full currency capability” on digital phones (see video, at 30 minutes). It should come as no surprise that these systems can as well be used for financial exclusion. Any person (or transaction) not approved of can be switched off.

In 2018 the AADHAAR system was abused: all details, including names, photos, addresses, postal codes, phone numbers and emails of all over 1 billion AADHAR registered Indians was published on WhatsApp and sold for Rs 500 (five hundred rupees), the equivalent of US $7 (seven dollars). Over 200 websites were displaying the names of government beneficiaries, along with their names, addresses and other details including their AADHAAR ID numbers. The possibility of developing these systems to become more invasive is ongoing.

The exposé reveals that the idea of using vaccines as sterilization agents – even without the public’s knowledge or consent – is documentable fact as opposed to conspiracy “theory”. Vaccines to reduce fertility was portrayed as an “immunological method” by the Rockefeller Foundation already in its 1968 annual report (see video, at 9 minutes, 15 seconds).

“Philanthropist” Bill Gates is rumoured to have an intense desire for a Nobel Prize, preferably the Peace Prize. Maybe it is just a rumour. If it is true, however, perhaps his friends at Ericsson can assist him. They have strong connections with Nobel selection committees. And with a few other sectors/industries. Needless to say, Bill and Melinda Gates spend large amounts on public imaging propaganda. Gates fund the Guardian’s Global development website; NPR’s (US National “Public” Radio’s) global health coverage; Our World in Data (that trace latest statistics and research on the Corona pandemic); BBC coverage of global health and development issues; world health coverage on ABC News; News Hour… and so on and so forth (see video, May 2020, at 7 minutes, 40 second).

So, to crown it all, need I go on? Every aspect of the Corona virus pandemic involves organisations, groups and individuals with direct ties to Gates funding (see video, at 10 minutes, 55 seconds). The World Health Organisation (WHO) has directed the global “response” to Corona. The WHO is largely reliant on funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (see video, at 11 minutes,25 seconds). The Gates Foundation contributes more funds to the WHO than Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Russia and the UK combined (see video, at 11 minutes, 45 seconds). 

So, without even getting into the virological aspects of Corona – or who hold patents related to the illness and the cures thereof – might there be a legitimate question as to whether somebody somewhere has an interest in getting us all vaccinated for something? And vaccinated again? It appears that Bill Gates has made more from Corona than he has from Microsoft. 

One of the narrator’s conclusions is that only the most wilfully obtuse could claim to be unable to see the nightmarish implications for this type of society where every transaction and every movement of every citizen is monitored, analysed and databased in real-time by the government. He also concludes that this is not about money. For Bill Gates this is about control. I have got to agree – it is about greed for power. And greed cannot be satisfied. No boundaries are intended. Bill Gates and his colleagues in crime want MORE. Beyond money-making in banking, Big Pharma, etc, there is a greed for additional power. 

We must recognise this greed-sickness for what it is and counteract it with our common humanity. If we don’t oppose having digital remote-controlled equipment implanted in our bodies we will, for all intents and purposes be reduced to extensions of the government’s body. We would be clusters of commodities that they consume. Like what they wear and what they eat. Second and third generations of this digital equipment would definitely interfere with our thinking ability. Personhood itself would be threatened.

We need to work hard to remember that life is beautiful. We must remind ourselves of this and ensure that it stays that way. We must hold onto our traditional understanding of “remind me”. We must reject the government’s interpretation of “re-mind” me, which involves rewiring our minds. We must insist that terms such as “inclusion”, “human rights” and “philanthropy” carry the traditional values we connote with them. We must show that we have had enough of the perversion of the language! Our new governments will need to have some form of “personhood laws”. In asserting our rights to personhood and personal dignity, we must refuse to be divided along national, ethnic, gender, “racial” or similar lines. We must focus on our common humanity and that most of us just want to live and let live. This is not about party politics. It is not about left and right, it is about wrong and right. It is about us all.