Netanyahu is not the disease, he is a symptom

Netanyahu - symptom of Israeli disease
Gilad Atzmon writes:

In a recent thought-provoking article Gideon Levy, probably one of the last genuine Israeli voices for peace, claims that “It is not Netanyahu who is responsible for Israeli racism, extreme nationalism, divisiveness, incitement, hatred, anxiety and corruption.” Behind Netanyahu, Levy says, there’s a nation of voters and other elected officials that aren’t very different from their leader. He continues:

Simply put, the people are the problem… There are those who have hated Arabs long before Netanyahu. There are those who despise blacks, detest foreigners, exploit the weak and look down their noses at the whole world – and not because of Netanyahu. There are those who believe they are the chosen people and therefore deserve everything.

Levy reaffirms the observation that I have been pushing for two decades. The problem with Israel is not of a political kind. The conflict with the Palestinians or the Arabs is not of a political nature as some delusional characters within the Palestinian solidarity movement have been proclaiming for years. Israel defines itself as the Jewish state. In order to understand Israel, its politics, its policies and the intrusive nature of its lobby, we must understand the nature of Jewishness. We must learn to define the differences between Jews (the people), Judaism (the religion) and Jewishness (the ideology). We have to understand how those terms are related to each other and how they influence Israeli and Jewish politics globally.

Levy writes that

there are those who think that after the holocaust, they are permitted to do anything. There are those who believe that Israel is tops in the world in every field, that international law doesn’t apply to it, and that no one can tell it what to do. There are those who think Israelis are victims – always victims, the only victims – and that the whole world is against us. There are those who are convinced that Israel is allowed to do anything, simply because it can.

In order to understand what Levy is referring to we must dig into the core of Jewish identity and once and for all grasp the notion of Jewish chosenness. Levy contends that

racism and xenophobia are deeply entrenched here, far more deeply than any Netanyahu… The apartheid did not start with him and will not end with his departure; it probably won’t even be dented. One of the most racist nations in the world cannot complain about its prime minister’s racism.

In other words, Netanyahu as such, is not the disease. He is merely a symptom.

… we are dealing with an institutionally racist and dangerous identity like no other.

The devastating news is that neither the Israeli ‘Left’ nor the Jewish so-called “anti-Zionist” league are any less racist than their Zionist foes. The Israeli Left pushes for a “two state solution”. It crudely ignores the Palestinian cause – i.e. the right of return. The Israeli Left advocates segregation and ghettoisation – not exactly the universal message of harmony one would expect from “leftists”. Disturbingly, the diaspora Jewish “anti-Zionist” Left is even more racially exclusive than the Israeli right. As I have explored many times in the past, UK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn’s ‘favourite Jewish political group, Jewish Voice for Labour (JVL), is a racially exclusive political cell. It wouldn’t allow gentiles into its Jews-only club. The Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) is no better. It will happily take donations from goyim but will never allow those goyim to become its board members.

Levy proclaims that “Netanyahu is the best thing to ever happen to Israeli politics – you can dump everything on him.” But in a most astute observation, which has been explored before by Uri Avnery (may he rest in peace) and yours truly, Levy continues, “It would be great if some local Nelson Mandela would arise, a brave leader with vision who would change the country’s basic values and lead a revolution. But no such person has been born here, and it’s doubtful he ever will be.”

Levy points at the core of the Zionist failure. If early Zionism was a promise to civilise the diaspora Jew by means of “homecoming”, Israel happened to do the complete opposite. Not much is left out of the Zionist promise to make the Jews “a people like all other peoples”: as Israel is about to perpetrate another colossal war crime in Gaza, we have to admit that we are dealing with an institutionally racist and dangerous identity like no other. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email