… and a delightful journey into Jewish political despair

By Gilad Atzmon

This week, a new Jewish “progressive” text has been published which you simply must read and circulate, not because it’s any good but quite the opposite: it is, as usual, just a window on Jewish tribal psychosis and morbid “progressive” nonsense. The reason you should read and spread Rewriting History: Holocaust Revisionism Today is because it is a delightful journey into Jewish political despair. They are losing the battle and they know it.

The organization Hope not hate presents itself as a left-wing anti-racism campaign and claims to “celebrate Britain’s diverse society”. So why does it engage in relentless thought-policing? The answer is that, though it claims to oppose the British far right, if you dig a little and you will find that HOPE not hate and its leader, Nick Lowles, are integral parts of the Zionist network, dedicated to promoting Jewish tribal politics.

Hand in hand with Zionists and Islamophobes

Last year I exposed HOPE not hate as a hasbara (Israeli propaganda) unit and an offshoot of the notoriously Zionist Searchlight Magazine. At the time, HOPE not hate had exhausted itself in a huge campaign to cancel a performance of mine at a Marxist arts festival in Bradford and, in order to have any chance of success, it joined forces with the infamous Zionist Board of Deputies of British Jews and the openly Islamophobic blog Harry’s Place. Lowles and his HOPE-less organization were both utterly defeated  because the Marxists who invited me knew very well who Lowles was and what he stood for. Again, a few month ago, the “anti-racist” Lowles campaigned against a Muslim conference. You get the picture. Zionists to the core, both HOPE not hate and Lowles are actually united against anyone and everyone who challenges Jewish power, supremacy and racism .

But here’s the good news. Lowles is unbelievably clumsy and never fails to expose himself and his minders as just one more hard-core Zionist tribal operators.

On 13 December this Zionist propaganda unit published Lowles’s latest book, now available online for free. But although Lowles – a Jewish former student activist – is against revisiting or revising British history, he is not against Israelis dismissing the Palestinian holocaust – he has no quarrel with Nakba denial. Nor does he oppose the deniers of the Armenian holocaust. Moreover, HOPE not hate is also strangely silent about the Ukrainian holocaust, the Holodomor, which, according to a prominent Israeli Zionist writer, Sever Plocker, and others, was largely inflicted by “Stalin’s Jews”, to quote the Israeli news website Ynet. Nick Lowles and HOPE not hate are completely uninterested in the denial of any holocaust – any, that is, except one.

Questionable credentials and flawed thinking

Rewriting History: Holocaust Revisionism Today is false from beginning to end but it does reveal what Zionists are trying to hide and the manner in which they do this. It is not clear who wrote this nonsense – an unknown David Williams is credited as the author, but we have no idea who he is and what are his credentials. Unlike revisionist texts that are, in most cases, meticulous as far as bibliographical and other details are concerned, Rewriting History lacks bibliographical reference and all other minimal academic requirements, which are so vital when dealing with such sensitive material.

But it’s funny, that’s for sure. Just check the first sentence. “Five years ago I was fortunate enough to visit Auschwitz, in Poland, with the Holocaust Educational Trust,” writes Lowles. No kidding. For those who do not know it, the Holocaust Educational Trust is a Jewish ultra-Zionist outfit, charged in the UK with Shoa indoctrination and, like Nick Lowles, it is interested only in the Shoa of one people and one people only. Visiting Auschwitz with the Holocaust Educational Trust is probably as informative as a sightseeing tour in Gaza concentration camp in the company of Tzipi Livni.

Ideologically and intellectually the book can be demolished in one paragraph. Lowles and his HOPE-less comrades have not a clue what history is and what it stands for. They cannot grasp that our knowledge of the past is meaningful only as long as it evolves, that the past becomes significant only when it is rewritten, revisited and revised. ‘History is the art of revision”.

Here is a good example. The term “ethnic cleansing” is relatively new to us and appears to have been made popular by the international media around 1992, following the discovery of Bosnian Serb concentration camps and the subsequent assault on Sarajevo – it was only after this that Israeli and Palestinian historians integrated the notion of “ethnic cleansing” into their discourse. Forty-five years after the mass expulsion of Palestine’s indigenous population they understood that the Palestinian Nakba was simply “Zionist ethnic cleansing”. In practice, they rewrote Palestinian history and re-presented facts within a broader, universal narrative. Rewriting the past is what historians do and rewriting history is inevitable: it cannot be stopped or silenced, not even by a dysfunctional hasbara unit within the “left”.

European guilt in the service of Israel

But it goes further. For many decades Europe was tormented by guilt. Those devastating images of liberated camps and Jewish holocaust survivors have stagnated into European ethical paralysis. For decades, this guilt was exploited by Israel and its messengers. The West kept silent when the Palestinians were expelled in 1948, forgave Israel when it adopted its racist laws of return (not one bit different from the Nazi Nuremberg Laws), and was understanding when Israel expanded and celebrated its racist symptoms at the expense of its neighbours. But now all this is changing.

After six decades of constant Israeli abuse of every possible human right, we are starting to see a tidal wave of resentment towards Jewish power and the Jewish state. It is more than likely that in the light of this change, Europeans will revisit their past and will rewrite it. Britain may even be courageous enough to look, for the first time, into its own crucial role in the destruction of European Jewry. How many people in Britain know that, at the time Nazi Germany was harassing its Jews, Britain closed its gates to Jewish refugees? How many people here grasp that Britain was complicit in the destruction of European Jewry?

Modern, diverse Britain, with its most precious asset, freedom of speech, is a wonderful thing – I came to this country because of it and I am willing to fight for it. Nick Lowles and HOPE not hate are the enemies of diversity and tolerance. They want us to stick with the Zionist Holocaust Educational Trust and their Judeocentric vision of the past but they don’t stand a chance. Our past, like our future, belongs to us – I mean all of us – and, as we progress, we will always revisit, revise and rewrite it. This form of activity is inherent to human nature.